Schedule the currently externally-proposed majority-carries referendum to be tabled
immediately. If there is no externally-proposed referendum currently, or if there is one
but it is not a majority-carries referendum then it fails.

The dispatch of this call must be `FastTrackOrigin`.

- `proposal_hash`: The hash of the current external proposal.
- `voting_period`: The period that is allowed for voting on this proposal.
	Must be always greater than zero.
	For `FastTrackOrigin` must be equal or greater than `FastTrackVotingPeriod`.
- `delay`: The number of block after voting has ended in approval and this should be
  enacted. This doesn't have a minimum amount.

Emits `Started`.

Weight: `O(1)`

- Problem Statement: The Polkadot ecosystem is facing issues with uncredited code use, misuse of the Polkadot brand, and unethical behavior by some teams. The intended audience is the Polkadot community, including developers, projects, and other stakeholders.
- Significance: The problem threatens the integrity of the Polkadot ecosystem, making it difficult for users to distinguish between good and bad actors, and potentially damaging the reputation and growth of the network.
- Proposed Solution: The establishment of the Polkadot Alliance, an on-chain collective founded by seven leading Polkadot projects. The Alliance aims to set and enforce standards for open-source development, manage its own membership, and curate an "Unscrupulous List" of unethical actors.
- Expected Outcomes: The Alliance will help protect the Polkadot ecosystem from unethical practices, promote open-source development standards, and provide a framework for recognizing teams that contribute positively to the ecosystem. This will enhance the reputation of Polkadot, foster trust among its users, and encourage further growth and development of the network.

#72 The Seeding of the Polkadot Alliance: Fighting for an open source culture and open collaboration that benefits the Polkadot ecosystem

No Active Proposals