Due to a very unfortunate un-note of our pre-image, Ref #734 did not execute in funds.&nbsp; <a href="734">https://polkadot.polkassembly.io/referenda/734</a> The public post on X can be found here: <a href="https://x.com/CultureDot1/status/1793330055856218225">https://x.com/CultureDot1/status/1793330055856218225</a> The Polkassembly post can be found here: <a href="referenda/734#zgUbn9UTtQtpl0EK1Njg">https://polkadot.polkassembly.io/referenda/734#zgUbn9UTtQtpl0EK1Njg</a>
Both posts hold the information for hash, extrinsic &amp; confirmations
Our beneficiary wallet for all proposals can be followed to verify no deposits for this referenda have been made.
All the information for the original referenda will stay the same, including - Visual Refresh Amount Requested Reduction of Cost
We have answered all questions in the posts from the original submission.&nbsp;
 The Refill comes at a time of relevant events happening within the city of Berlin and due to our technical oversight, we have now put at risk this proposal re-passing, which we take full responsibility for.&nbsp; There will be no further Re-fill requested should this come to pass &mdash; we believe in the power of branding &amp; impressions, however we also believe in life-span and impact deteriorating from too much time vs exposure.&nbsp; 
Thank you for understanding and once again, apologies for the confusion.&nbsp; Sincerely,&nbsp; CD1

Due to a very unfortunate un-note of our pre-image, Ref #734 did not execute in funds.   
[https://polkadot.polkassembly.io/referenda/734](734)  
  
  
The public post on X can be found here:  
[https://x.com/CultureDot1/status/1793330055856218225](https://x.com/CultureDot1/status/1793330055856218225)  
  
The Polkassembly post can be found here:  
[https://polkadot.polkassembly.io/referenda/734#zgUbn9UTtQtpl0EK1Njg](referenda/734#zgUbn9UTtQtpl0EK1Njg)

Both posts hold the information for hash, extrinsic & confirmations

Our beneficiary wallet for all proposals can be followed to verify no deposits for this referenda have been made.

All the information for the original referenda will stay the same, including -  
Visual Refresh  
Amount Requested  
Reduction of Cost

We have answered all questions in the posts from the original submission. 

  
The Refill comes at a time of relevant events happening within the city of Berlin and due to our technical oversight, we have now put at risk this proposal re-passing, which we take full responsibility for.   
  
There will be no further Re-fill requested should this come to pass — we believe in the power of branding & impressions, however we also believe in life-span and impact deteriorating from too much time vs exposure.   
  

Thank you for understanding and once again, apologies for the confusion.   
Sincerely,   
CD1

- **Problem Statement:** Ref #734 did not execute in funds, leading to a need for a refill.
- **Significance:** The refill is crucial due to relevant events in Berlin and the risk of the proposal not passing.
- **Proposed Solution:** Requesting a refill for Ref #734 with the same details.
- **Expected Outcomes:** Ensuring the proposal passes, maintaining the original visual refresh, requested amount, and cost reduction.

#854 RE-SUBMISSION OF REF #734 - BERLIN TAXI REFILL